It may be an unpopular view, but I just don’t dig many of the films of Martin Scorsese, arguably the most revered director working today. Give him a gangster scenario, with explosions of blood, male braggadocio and women getting shoved around, and the critics and audiences are wowed; from Raging Bull to Casino to The Departed to The Irishman, that’s the formula that we seem to love him for. But when Scorsese flexes his muscles on other subjects whether via King of Comedy, Kundun, The Age of Innocence, Hugo or Silence, that fanboy enthusiasm seems to be posted missing. His Wolf of Wall Street feels like a boys club celebration of the crime of capitalist excess, and while I can’t knock stone-cold classics like Taxi Driver or Goodfellas, I can’t help feeling that what people like so much about Scorsese is his sympathetic portrayal of violent men.
Having got all this out of the way, Killers of the Flower Moon may well be Scorsese’s most mature film to date, a thoughtful, detailed, angry account of how respected white men abused and murdered their way through many Native American women without much sanction back in the 1920’s. If his earlier films walked, and occasionally fell off a tightrope of glamourizing violence, Killers of the Flower Moon sticks the landing by focusing on a strong female character, Millie played by Lily Gladstone. She’s a prosperous Native American of the Osage Nation tribe, wowed by returning soldier Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio). He’s physically and emotionally shell-shocked by his experience of war, but the influence of his uncle William King Hale proves to be his undoing. Hale (De Niro relishing his “Call me king’ line) is working on a slow process of funneling much of the Native American wealth into his own family pocket, and while there’s the kind of sporadic threats and intimidation that might be expected from a Jim Jordan speaker campaign, Hale’s lockstep partnership with local lawmen allows him to steal and murder the locals on an industrial scale.
Killers of the Flower Moon has a violent, compelling true-life crime story at its heart, adapted by Eric Roth and Scorsese from David Gann’s book. ‘Can you see the wolves in this picture”? runs a caption in the book about the Osage that Burkhart reads for local colour, but the wolves are hiding in plain sight here. In a society where you’re more lightly to face consequences ‘for kicking a dog than killing an Indian’, the narrative spirals down into dark, animalistic recesses, but the picture takes a lift when Millie’s cry for help leads to an Elliott Ness-type FBI agent (Jesse Plemons) being dispatched to get to the bottom of the racist, near genocidal angle that Hale’s men have taken with impunity.
Scorsese has plenty of history with DiCaprio and De Niro, and elicits huge performances from both, with De Niro a fierce adversary draped in respectability, and DiCaprio capturing the torn position of a man who knows what’s right but can’t get any purchase on his own morality. But what makes this film worthy of the five star rating is Gladstone; although she doesn’t speak much, what she says is devastatingly to the point. A razzle-dazzle meta ending, with a delicious send-off cameo from Scorsese, should ensure that Killers is an awards contender; it’s certainly one of Scorsese’s best films, and that’s saying something.
Thanks to Paramount Pictures UK for providing big screen access to this film, Killers of the Flower Moon is out in the UK, US and worldwide from Oct 20th 2023.
Great review! Loved the film. Here is my personal review explaining why it connected with me so deeply.
https://huilahimovie.reviews/2023/11/01/killers-of-the-flower-moon-2023-movie-review/
Cool, I’ll be over to check this out, thanks!
Was knocked out by this precisley because it didn’t follow the same style of his previous gangster epics. Thank goodness he’s lived to 80 so he could achieve screen maturity, but I know what you mean. And the performances from the two D’s are just amazing, like nothing the pair have ever done before.
Glad you saw it! Scorsese steps away from identifying the audience with the violent parties, and that makes a difference. Old school perhaps, but with a twist in terms of conception, and I dug the curtain call for the director, a bold move.
The Lucky Strike sequence was amazing. You’re a radio guy so you know the work that goes in behind the scenes but all those sound effects, wow.
I suppose we’ll do this over a couple of nights at some point. It does seem like he’s doing his “sympathetic portrayal of violent men” with di Caprio though. Yep unenthusiastically.
I guess many films are sympathetic portrayals of violent men, but I think Marty gets it right in this instance. Book your home cinema for a week.
I am interred in this movie but do not want to sit in a theater for three and a half hours.
I do wonder if people who make films of this length understand how hard it is for audiences to find this kind of time.
Martin Scorsese’s movies are usually long. I think people know that when going to watch one.
Sure, but it would be nice if he made some movies that could be watched as part of an enjoyable evening rather than an ordeal.
Hugo was a good family movie.
And I totally rate Age of Innocence. But his fans only turn up for the bloodletting.
Nahhhhhh.
To the film or my review? Both, I imagine.
My local theater is showing this and as it is the only possible movie that I might have a faint interest in seeing, I was waiting for a review.
I will remain theaterless until Top Gun: Maverick: Goose is released, I guess…
We’ll get down and buy a ticket, you can have a nice long snooze if nothing else.
I have better things to waste my money on. 🙂
Martin Scorsese’s films are obviously solid. They’re never going to be my absolute favorites, but I really appreciate that he’s still going, making films for adults, and I love that he took shots for saying the obvious–Marvel may be entertainment, but it’s not cinema.
I’ll see this one for sure.
He’s never made a film as good as the Eras concert movie, that’s for sure, but I admire him for trying. 208 mins is a long time, but it’s half what Magic Mike 3 felt like. And yes, comic book movies are mostly rubbish, but that doesn’t excuse me having to sit through waffle like Kundun. I saw that one in a completely empty cinema in Portland, no thrill seekers bothered with that one.
Yes, I had a particular distaste for The Wolf of Wall Street. I can recognize it intellectually as a pretty good film, but I just don’t want to watch those movies of the toll of extreme excess.
Good choice. I gave it a two star review writing elsewhere. It’s got some brilliant moments and scenes, but it’s just male bragging.
How come you never use political stuff from Scotland? Is that because nothing of importance is actually happening?
Because what’s going on in Scotland doesn’t make much difference on a global scale.
It’s up to you then to put Scotland on the map. Make it happen!
I do what I can.
Well, that’s not much of a reason. I want to read the latest on James McJordan, of Clan Argyle.
We’re a satellite of a satellite of a satellite, but the whole world is watching America. If that domino falls, we’re all done for.
Hate to break this news flash to you boyo, but America doesn’t have a future. Even in the most upbeat Christian eschatology circles, there’s no mention of an America in prophecy. It’s all Europe.
See, do I know how to cheer someone up, or what? 😀
So come over and join us, scrabbling in the dirt in our ill fitting, European cut jeans!
No thank you. I’ll take my relaxed fit jeans any day, all day. And none of that silly narrow leg stuff either. I don’t want to see that some poor sap has twigs for legs….
Boot cut, for the working man. Anyway, I’m just reporting what Republican Party representatives are calling out, can’t they be trusted?
They don’t wear jeans at all, so no, on this issue they CANNOT be trusted…
What do they wear? Hoodies?
3 piece suits. Democrats wear 5 piece suits. That’s how you tell them apart.
What does James MacJordan, of Clan Argyle, wear? Besides socks I mean.
A kilt. Mine has taken some moth damage but still holds together.
Looking forward to this, but hearing that bit about a razzle-dazzle meta ending with cameo by Scorsese made my heart sink a bit. Glad to hear De Niro is doing something worthwhile, because recently he hasn’t been great. I’m not really looking forward to seeing DiCaprio or Plemons much either. I’ll have to keep expectations in check. Want to read the book first too.
Having got my big picture objections out of the way, this is a riveting movie, and even the Lake Wobegone Days ending works. Great acting, interesting historical story, overall winner. 206 minutes is a long time to sit in one place, but its worth it.
Oh man, another epic I’m going to have to watch over three days.
Or go to the cinema and see it in one go: was happy this started at 9.15am.
Did they give you bathroom breaks? Because that’s a long time to hold it….
Not with an Iron Man constitution. We’re tough on this side of the Pond.
Ahhh, they give you special suits so you can go while sitting in your seat.
The Future of Cinema. Who knew?
No, we act like grown ups and visit the conveniences after the credits roll.
Grown ups don’t wear skinny jeans…
Who does?
I won’t say, as my manly disgust at pansies and wusses might overcome me and I say something uncouth…
Can’t we all just wear the jeans that fit us? Is that too much to ask? To tolerate different taste in apparel?
Nope.
Yes.
Not a chance.
As you can see, I represent my Constituents on this very important issue and I won’t go down without a fight.
How would you feel if someone tried to tell you want kind of outrageous strides to wear? If anyone tried to stop you prancing around in your Fuzzy Zoellers?
What is a stride? and what are Fuzzy Zoellers?
We here in America speak simple American, not your fancy pantsy King’s English…
https://youtu.be/tYhm61J1EJU?si=t9pFaJZG72EcDISa
I always knew golf was a sport for pansies. Now I have proof positive…
What country to golfers like Jack Nicklaus or Tom Wisekopf come from? America. Even the Brits mock your garish pantaloons.
Nice try on the deflection but you can’t pull the socks over my eyes…
Compelling visual evidence.
I see right through you on this issue!
You can only put your head in the sand for so long; you can’t run away from the truth!
That Jane Austen rocks? I not only face that truth, I champion it…
Stone Cold Steve is the only good Austen I know.
You’re not even a barbarian, you’re a troglydite…
Come back here and spell that correctly to my face…
Erveryone noes that ole enggglish wuz spelt difrently bahk in tha 1800’s.
We don’t get bathroom breaks in cinemas over here Booky, which is the main reason I have a cinema room at home!
The last time I went to a cinema I was 6. So they probably don’t over here either, but I have no actual facts to back up either option.
I think your option is the best. How big is your screen?
Not big enough, 50 inches but we’re going for a 70 at some point in the near future.
Hahaha!
We have a 32 or 36 and I remember when that was still “massive” 🙂
I think our eyes get smaller as we get older so we need bigger tellys 🤣
Sounds scientific to me!
It’s not the size of your tv, it’s the quality of what you watch. That’s why I have bought the Police Academy films on blu ray.
You’d be better served watching 4 different versions of Sense and Sensibility. That’s class!
Crope. No Stone Cold Jane Austen for me!
Barbarian!
Well that’s a load of baloney. Size DOES matter!
My police academy boxed set is massive!
Then you will need a big telly!
Yeah, me too, let’s not go there 🤣