Peter Carey’s writings have been turned into big-screen entertainment with intermittent success; his screenplay for Wim Wenders’ Until the End of the World is something of a secret triumph, even if the wonderfully quirky film itself didn’t reach the mainstream. Laura Jones had more success with her take on Oscar and Lucinda, and Gillian Armstrong’s spare, austere visuals provided a sensitive gloss to the soul-searching individuals at the narrative’s core.
One’s heart sinks, however at the notion of director Justin Kurzel having a go at Carey’s prose; the man behind the lamentable Assassins Creed adaptation and an even duller version of Macbeth would seem like the wrong man for a tricky job, and so it proves. The Ned Kelly story has been told before, notably with Mick Jagger and Heath Ledger, and this time around, 1917 star George Mackay takes the lead, by dint of his Australian father. A caption, ‘None of what follows is true,’ recalls Butch Cassidy and the Sundance kid, but even the fictional elements here are strictly revisionist stuff, with character motivations generally ascribed to sex, impotence and randomness.
A lengthy sequence establishing Kelly’s relationship with his father gives way to a striking introduction of Mackay, physically contorted in front of a Union Jack flag. Charlie Hunnam turns up as a copper, while a bearded Russell Crowe seems to enjoy himself as a writer with a taste for obscene verse. But things often feel different when translated from page to screen, and Kurzel’s film suffers from adhering without much thought to the clichés of the Western genre, with a tough hero, struggling with inner demons and confused sexuality, leading a band of misfits to one last, misguided stand.
The gifted Mackay is probably about as good as he could be in the circumstances, and after a draggy mid-section, the final climax is reasonably compelling as white-hooded figures surround Kelly and his gang in their metallic strong-hold. But Carey’s interest in myth and reality does not survive the translation here; Kelly is just one more wronged maverick seeking oblivion outside of societal norms, and whatever made the book’s blend of reality and myth so potent just writhes around in the dirt and filth here.
Of all the various Ned Kelly films this attracted the least of my interest.
It’s probably the best of the three which is not saying much.
As if the subject was of any interest to anyone. Not quite Robin Hood.
When are you going to review Metalstorm: The Destruction of Jared-Syn?
I’ll keep this as a surprise, for when you least expect it. Got a Police Academy boxed set to work my way through, but hoping to provide definitive commentary on the Ulysses of 80’s comedy.
Love you to join my blogathon… https://weegiemidget.wordpress.com/2023/10/15/hammer-and-amicus-blogathon/
I am keen to do so! My computer is broken just now so I’m writing everything on my phone in gmail, which isn’t ideal. I can’t comment on blogs or do anything, but will examine the Amicus/Hammer catalogues and come up with something, thanks for the invite!
Looking forward to seeing what you come up with.. it’s not til December so hopefully your computer will be ok then. Be lovely to have you if you can.
Didn’t know anything about Ned Kelly so I wiki’d him and the page takes longer to read than it would to watch a movie, so yer man Kurzel must have left a heap of stuff out. Anyway he doesn’t sound like a nice guy (Kelly not Kurzel) nor as fun as Bonnie & Clyde or Butch and Sundance, so I’ll be noping this.
He’s a kind of Count Bin-face / Lord Buckethead character but I wouldn’t feel any need to explore further if you are already familiar with these modern political figures.
I’ve got to agree with your assessment. In college I randomly took a class in New Zealand and Australian literature (it fit in my schedule, but ended up being fascinating) and we read all about the Kelly gang. So I always catch these adaptations with high hopes.
Thus far, I’ve always been disappointed.
I just can’t imagine Peter Carey coming out of the Assassins Creed video game adaptation and saying ‘that’s the guy I want to make my work’! He’s an excellent writer, and makes something far more interesting that any of the films. They are uniformly tin-pot stuff.
I wonder if I could sell a movie if I posed in front of an American flag? Worth a shot….
Pics? With a telescope and three cornered hat? And ideally with Mrs Bookstodoge in the background please.
What about a 5 cornered hat? I hear those were the rage back in 1937….
It depends how many corners your head has.
Zero. I have a very smooth head. It’s why I look so good bald. I’m talking bruce willis good too.
So when are YOU going to start wearing a hat?
I wore a hat yesterday, your sources are wrong. And I have hair on my head too, in all five corners.
I have no sources. Kelly killed all my informers.
If you have hair on your head, you might want to go to a doctors to get that checked out. All the beautiful people are bald…
Isn’t Alex ‘Hills Have Eyes’ Good also of the egg-head persuasion? I guess if you can’t have flowing, lustrous locks like mine, it’s a consolation prize.
What a killer argument!
Thanks. Never let it be said that I have no sympathy or compassion for those without hair. It’s just luck or good genes that enables those of us with beautiful hair to be magnanimous about your unfortunate situation. Nothing more need separate us.
Except good taste of course.
No shampoos staining our souls, no hair gel glooping up our suits, no dandruff flaking into our corn flakes. I tell you, I don’t know how you stand it.
Plus, hair ties. You have have to have a whole dresser/drawer full of them…
https://images.app.goo.gl/MGx9q9MmapAb9U969
A 5 cornered hat would take of ALL of that….
So where is your hat?
How DARE you sir, HOW DARE YOU!?!?
You wouldn’t ask Bruce Willis to put a hat on. And I’m offended that you would ask me too.
I call you out and select cabers at dawn. In Buckingham Palace, third floor, 32nd room on the right.
Even a balaclava would be better than nothing. Hand knitted like your nog.
Fine, I was going to let King Charlie be your second, but with that attitude, you get Camilla. Good luck if she has to toss any cabers….
You can have them both, we don’t have any use for them. I’ll use your coconut for target practice.
Well, you have to have a second, that’s the rule…
A second head? I think one is more than enough, even with five corners like Alex.
Don’t blame me, I didn’t make the rules. But if you want to duel, you gotta do it by the rules…
Who has the golden hair, makes the rules, and I say; off with your coconut!
Was always interested in seeing Mick’s version. Not interested in this at all.
When are you going to review Pootie Tang?
The Jagger version is rubbish too, and so its the Heath Ledger one. I don’t know why they bother.
No Pootie Tang, but in order to satisfy the peanut gallery you inhabit, I have just bought a blu-ray set of the complete Police Academy films. So something for us all to look forward to.
Oh save us!
I’ll save you a front row seat.
Not what I meant!
I’ll save the boxed set and send it down.
It will not be admitted to the building unless it contains lots of 20 quid notes.
Lots of laughs?
Nope.