Yikes! This sequel to 2018 hit The Meg went from a much anticipated guilty pleasure tent-pole summer release to an abrupt also-ran when press screenings were abandoned and a risible 28 percent critics score on Rotten Tomatoes emerged. That hasn’t stopped a good few hardy souls from turning out to see Ben Wheatley’s adaptation of book two of a six book sequence by author Steve Alten, first published over twenty years ago, although as with the first film, it’s the wild performance of this shark-stew in the lucrative Chinese market that makes the difference between a hit and a flop. Cultural differences are one thing, but despite the gulf between Western and Eastern cultures, the idea of seeing Jason Statham fighting cheesy sea monsters seems to be a staple, shared obsession around the world. So lets get our prehensile tentacles mashed by the spinning rotor blades of The Meg 2: The Trench…
Despite the involvement of Wheatley, who took over when the first film’s equally anonymous director Jon Turteltaub left the project, there’s none of Wheatley’s folk-horror trademarks here; this is written by committee stuff. We start 65 million years ago with that ancient gag about one creature getting eaten by another and another until… Meg 2’s disturbed trench releases a whole new toy range of aquatic beasties and we skip forward to the present day and Statham in his element with some talking parrot-related comedy in the Philippines. Jonas Taylor (Statham) is now a ‘green James Bond’, pretending to work for the ‘home office’ while taking down pesky ocean polluters. We know Taylor is a good guy because when we hear people taking about him, they say, ‘Wherever he goes, people just love him, god knows why.’ This kind of audience-leading margin note, following hard on last weekend’s laugh-track in Kandahar (‘I like him, he’s good!’) feels like the nadir of lazy writing; how about creating actual scenes or dialogue that might lead viewers to the same conclusion about our heroes?
Anyway, we probably shouldn’t be surprised that a franchise dedicated to the idea of shark jumping should jump the shark of credulity at the first possible opportunity. The Trench has a mix of po-faced exo-suited scientists, a giant Sidney Powell-like Kraken to release, and some velociraptor-lite menaces to spice up the stuttering backstory before Jonas finally confronts his own whale with an airplane propeller for a spear. ‘It’s a Meg and you’re a snack,’ is about the most profound line of dialogue on offer here, although ‘There’s no telemetry’ works too when it comes to laughable tech-talk. Despite such infelicities, Meg 2: The Trench is remarkably dull with it’s diligent, desperate servicing of its Chinese audience and Comic-Con fanboys , with yet another dust-off for the ‘They’re not action figures, they’re figurines’ line that was old hat in Die Hard 4 back in 2007.
Things finally jump up a notch when we get to hedonistic tourist resort Fun Island, where The Meg 2 finally remembers a few of the moves featured in the film it’s a sequel to. So we abandon the tedious underwater race-and-chase exploring in favour of helicopter shots of beaches of tourists captured in carefree cavorting with little notion a deadly giant squid is incoming. From morals about respecting your family to cute dogs to be rescued, Meg 2 is lowest common denominator stuff for international audiences, although the absurdity does sometimes rock the needle; Statham kicking an adversary into the path of an incoming megladon is admittedly a cool visual. So Meg 2 has a few choice moments, even if it’s just a bland re-tread of an original that wasn’t exactly fresh from the get-go; these silly shark shenanigans are more Deep Blue Sea than Jaws.
I’ll be only one who enjoyed this then. Three Megs instead of one. What’s not to like? And the Jaze turned almost lovable. Pure popcorn.
It has its moments, I’ll give you that. Booting the bad guys into the sharks mouth was cool.
Felt at times like Piranha 3D.
Phil keeps saying we’ve seen this, but I’m pretty sure we haven’t now, and he’s mixed it up with No.1. Or perhaps it’s a ploy so I don’t get to see it and be disappointed. Who knows? Anyhoo I either have no memory of it, a false memory of it or have just seen the trailers. Sigh. Nope anyway.
I was surprised when you said you’d seen this, I suspect you’re right and that it’s the first one that you’ve seen. Fast forward to the last 30 minutes if you really have to.
Yes I’m right, I checked our Prime viewing records and we’ve seen Meg 1 twice! Probably a better option than seeing 1 & 2 by the sounds of things.
There’s only so much that can go wrong with Statham vs Shark, but most of it does go wrong here. I doubt you’ll need several looks at this…
So Statham has descended to doing monster movies. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. Anyone who would do a second Crank movie will do anything I guess…
Agreed. Statham is a great leading man, but they’ve never quite found the right roles for him, and he phones this in…
I liked the Transporter movies.
And the first Mechanic remake was decent.
I feel like he’s everywhere, trying to do everything. I wonder how rich he is….
Very.
Well then, I guess I’m going to have to shake him down. He needs to spread the wealth…
He’ll spear you with a propeller if you try…
Good thing I just invented my “anti-propeller” spray then. It’s like shark repellent. Just spray it on and wham, I don’t have to worry about propellors of any kind….
Statham would have you ground into fish fingers and nibble on your breadcrumbs for breakfast…
Well, I better make sure I bring some tartar sauce then. I hope I have some. Wouldn’t want to have to make a grocery run on the Sabbath after all…
But you’re OK for Statham to eat you?
Well, if he wants to get infected with my non-celebrity-ness, he’s welcome to take some of my weight. I sure won’t miss it!
Ba-dumpf, nice tie in with the other big topic of today. Apart from paper-clips…
Big sharks, big paperclips, big weight loss. We are ON TOPIC today!
Agreed. Firing on all cylinders.
I’m thinking we should start our own Anti-View. Kind of like hte View but from a mans perspective.
Can I be Whoopi?
Absolutely! I suspect your movie reviewing credentials will help you fit into the role too.
Who will you be?
I’ll be the fat, errr, I mean, the non-traditional weight loud mouth one.
That way we keep the diversity angle fresh…
What about Alex and fraggle?
They’ll have to come up with their characters. I don’t have time to deal with free loaders on my creative genius…
Title? The View from Nowhere?
No, we need something manly yet grandiose.
The Gaze…..
hahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaaa
You and Sexi Alexi can have your own show called The Gaze if you want, me and fraggle will have one called A View to a Kill.
Awesome. The show has already split before even starting.
That should get the news outlets rumbling. Free publicity….
That’s too bad. Seems like the kind of project it would have been hard to mess up. Just hit your marks, make some jokes, show us the shark . . . Wheatley seems like a really poor fit for the material though.
He would be if he was making any effort, but just being at the helm of a big film seems to be his goal here; it could be directed by AI. The last section of the film has the kind of silly thrills you’d hope for, but that first hour is just awful…
Sam Adams had a good read on this today. You might find it interesting.
https://slate.com/culture/2023/08/meg-2-haunted-mansion-disney-marvel-directors-hacks.html
Hack work is a tradition, maybe even a noble tradition. Fried king was the kind of auteur who killed the auteur system. IP rights are easier for a studio to handle than stars, directors or talent. But franchises are a streaming thing now, and steaming is cratering; cinema should be the preserve of the new. The bummer from that article is the idea of Gerwig doing Narnia.
Yup. Agree with all of this!