Let’s talk about sex, or at least, the Canadian Film Development Corporation brand of sex; this adaptation of Stephen Vizinczey’s bestselling book, now sold as part of the Penguin Modern Classics range, took a whopping $20 million at the box office back in 1978, and yet has been completely forgotten by popular culture to the point where it’s currently sporting a grand total of, em, none critical reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The death of Milan Kundera this week put me in mind to take another look at this picaresque series of romantic encounters against a background of the rise of totalitarianism; I was an impressionable 13 when I saw George Kaczender’s film on Channel 4, so what would just a ripe, potentially fetid text mean in the cold light of 2023?
Quite a bit, actually; ‘My life revolves around the women I have loved,’ says András Vayda (Tom Berenger) as he reflects on a series of sexual dalliances, some of which are problematic to our judgemental eyes these days. Separated from his beloved mother and his even more beloved religion during WWII, Vayda starts out pimping out women to GI’s on a military base, and begging for and getting his first sexual encounter with a Countess while still in tender, single figures. Vayda isn’t sure whether to be a ‘missionary or a martyr,’ but when women his own age don’t respond to chat-up lines like ‘Come with me to the casbah.’ Vayda humblebrags his way into the realms of Hungarian and then Canadian literary glitterati. ‘No doubt you’ve read my summary of socialist culture in peace loving nations?’ is the earnest chat that Vayda is keen to avoid, and one way out of being labelled ‘intense and obvious’ is to focus on learning about love with a series of older women.
Back in 1978, exuding sexuality wasn’t something that female performers were encouraged to feel guilty about, and Kaczender’s film has quite a roster of talents; Karen Black, Susan Strasberg, Helen Shaver, Alexandra Stewart and the great Alberta Watson, performing ‘Sailor, sailor, drop your anchor here’ in a knowing way that would make Sally Bowles blush. ‘An honest approach to sex gets you absolutely nowhere,’ says Vayda ruefully as another relationship collapses, but it’s not apparent exactly why he overtly begs every woman he meets for intimacy. Escaping from the Velvet Revolution in Hungary in 1956, Vayda is happy to be recognised as a philosopher, even a ‘Mad Magyar philosopher’; one of his teachers suggests that ‘I thought you Hungarians were real heroes in the battle between the sexes’ to which he evasively replies ‘I’m a pacifist’. ‘Freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom!” is Vayda’s own political and personal goal, but the tide of history is running against him and he heads for Montreal to escape violence in Hungary.
‘I would never accept that which the heart rejects,’ suggests an epiphany in Vayda’s life; his bildungsroman progression is presented with hazy sentiment, a ‘fabulous tourist map’ to erotic fulfilment, and it’s probably as well that ‘the adventures of a middle aged man are another story’ since the film’s coda seems to suggest that pursuing younger women would be a natural sequel. Vizinczey’s writing was praised by Graham Greene, not the kind of critic who spits out casual pull-quotes, and the dialogue is often smart ; ‘You’re a philosopher?’ ‘How did you guess?’ ‘Your socks don’t match’. The largely female cast all make something memorable out of well-drawn, salty-with-experience characters, and a pre-stardom Berenger is no slouch either. Yayda is defined by a scene in which he woos a potential mentor by reaching for a Cinzano ashtray while framed by a half crate of champagne bottles at a nightclub booth as violins swoon on the soundtrack. This is a romantic film in an old-fashioned sense, even when this brand of romance is out of fashion; to get to the version I re-watched last night, I had to navigate labels for ‘hot sex’ and ‘granny porn’; we seem to have swapped such honest public confessions from frenetic private vices these days.
I saw this and wondered what your thoughts were. I didn’t want to wait until tomorrow because I might forget about, movies being so important to me and all 😉
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/hollywood-streaming-theaters/2023/07/16/id/1127329/
I wouldn’t lose any sleep over this. A big deal for actors and writers, and I’ll probably write something aboutit, but I doubt you’ll see any change in your viewing other than a lack of talk show action.
So the end of hollywood isn’t as near as that guy is saying?
I know you’re keen for it to happen, but bear in mind the two main functions of news are to comfort and alarm you.
Fabulous critique of well titled film! Lots of zingers, “…knowing way that would make Sally Bowles blush” is a keeper! Thanks!
Don’t let the three stars fool you, I love this film. Wouldn’t get made today, but we should be glad it happened at all!
I used to have a penchant for Tom Beringer. Hmm, Beringer, Hardy, Hiddlestone, I’m a Tomaholic! Anyways haven’t seen this, and finding it seems fraught so nope.
Sigh, not a musical, not a comedy, no Chevy Chase, starring a hunky TOM, WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT!?
You could chuck a Hemsworth in, preferably Chris.
Doesn’t a Berenger beat a Hemsworth?
Nope, TB is 74 now.
That’s a fact, but have you seen him in his 20’s? He was quite a dude.
Well duh! That’s why he’s on my Tom List. Not quite as a has-been, as he’s still available in all his celluloid glory, but as a venerable legend.
He’s a hottie, just sayin’!
Older women, older movies . . . been there.
summery, in which woos, navaigate
Thanks for the typos. You must have seen this, compulsory in Canadian schools I’d imagine?
The only compulsory viewing in Canadian schools was Paddle to the Sea. What about in Scotland?
Was that the 50 Shades of Gray back, checks notes on Alex’s childhood’s years, in 1941?
It’s the film that inspired children across the country to take up whittling.
Pics of you whittling?
I took them with a camera I whittled out of some pine . . .
Ok, so let’s see your tiny whittling?
All yours….
Thanks.
So this IS the star of Substitute 2, one of the five films you’ve seen?
I hate to correct such an august and wise movie man as yourself, BUT I will anyway.
He is the star of the FIRST Substitute movie.
Then for whatever reason Treat Williams decided that there just weren’t enough Substitutes and thought 3 more was the right amount.
What Williams was thinking was beyond me. I’m guessing a decent sized paycheck…
I bow to your superior knowledge on the Substitute films. Couldn’t that be something you write about?
Not a chance. I’ve got top quality books like “The Detective” to read and review. No time for movies…
Can’t I interview you about them?
Oh right, that pesky promise I made you. Man, being so famous has some real downsides, that’s for sure.
Fiiiiine, ask your Everyman questions. i’ll do my best to answer gnomically and as off topic as possible.
Can’t you just use the ones I sent you last time?
Oh puuuleaaze. Those questions were so yesterday. My fans need new and intriguing questions…
Why?
Why not?
Wut?
1) Because I said so
2) Because it’s bad for your teeth
3) Elucidate please….
The prosecution rests. We’ll take a break for lunch and to allow the clerk to prepare my black cap for sentencing. Any questions?
You’re not a REAL interviewer are you?
And this wasn’t an interview, it was a trial, and your answers have only confirmed your guilt. And you are GUILTY!
Guilty of being Totes Awesome!
You get a gold gavel for having such good taste…