Not the Michael Jackson musical fantasia from 1988, but a wild and silly fiction about the faking of the 1969 moon landings, Antoine Bardou-Jacquet’s comedy drops on Prime in the UK with the grating sound of a barrel being scraped one last time. While the concept and the cast are good enough for sure, Moonwalkers is the kind of film that frustrates due to its inability to realise a fairly simple idea. A now-it-can-be-told story of wide-boys, gangsters and feckless film-makers should be a lot of laughs, but there’s a few reasons why this film is as obscure and buried as…Stanley Kubrick’s secret film about the 1969 moon landings?
Rupert Grint takes centre stage here as Jonny Thorpe, a Robin Askwith type of low-life hustler, unsuccessfully managing awful bands and snorting huge amounts of cocaine that he can’t afford, leaving him prey to violent drug-dealers. By chance, Thorpe happens to be in the office of Derek Kaye (Stephen Campbell Moore) an equally drug-addled agent who, while dealing with a nose-bleed caused by his own excessive drug use, misses a meeting with CIA operative Tom Kidman (Ron Perlman) that Thorpe takes. Thorpe gets one of his pals to dress up as Stanley Kubrick, a deception that Kidman somehow doesn’t recognise as being fake, and the duo seal the deal to fake the moon landings. Thorpe and his gang use the money for partying, then find out that they’re in hock to the CIA, local gangsters and pretty much everyone in Swinging London. And given the CIA’s willingness to ‘bury the architects’ behind their illicit schemes, Jonny Thorpe and co may have a limited time to enjoy snorting their winnings…
Moonwalkers looks lively from the get-go, but after about twenty minutes, it becomes obvious that Dean Craig’s script isn’t really going to be about Kubrick or faking the moon landings, but just another sub Guy Ritchie geezer comedy, with lashings of bloody comic violence and not much else. Perlman is admirably straight-faced as the improbably named Kidman, but not much else works here; there’s tonnes of almost- in-jokes (like calling a character Tom Kidman) but unfortunately the cultural commentary that should be the text is made sub-text to some lame 90’s era gangster comedy. It also makes zero sense that the moon-landing film has to be given a stressful beam-back broadcast ‘as live’ some weeks before the actual landing; there’s fiction, and then there’s just not making any sense at all.
Both NASA and Stanley Kubrick’s fabled careers have drawn huge interest from conspiracy theorists over the years, and it was probably inevitable that the intersection between the two would draw some speculative attention. But Moonwalkers is a hard film to recommend largely due to its treatment of drugs as a hilarious lads joke, non-existent female characters to balance up the dated Loaded-magazine humour, and a general sense that the film-makers have missed every possible trick here. Capricorn One did it all far better, and with a lot less free advertising for cocaine…
You’ve done me the honour of not having to seek it out.
As jerry Springer used to say, i talk to freaks so you don’t have to.
Nope. What is Perlman doing, he’s in a fair amount of dodgy movies, watched Monster Hunt last night and there he was all longhaired and silly looking. At least he looks better in this one.
He’s actually the saving grace here, really good actor, poorly served here…caramelised onions?
Man, what is with the Harry Potter stars taking on some really crap projects? I bet Grint doesn’t have to work a day if he would live a modest lifestyle and he could spend his days reading or painting or sculpting or something leisurely. Instead, he does this.
too bad a bear doesn’t just come and eat them all. That would be a great prequel for Cocaine Bear.
I’d pay to see that. But apart from Radcliffe’s Weird Al film, it’s been slim pickings for the Potter stars…
with just a bit of judicious editing, I bet you could do it yourself. Re-release it as a Cocaine Bear prequel and make a bundle.
These ideas just write themselves.
If you win a grammy because of it, I want half the statue, since it was my idea.
If this idea wins a Grammy, you can have the whole statue.
Excellent. A little gold statute would look great on my bookshelf
As soon as it arrives, it’s yours.
I can see it already.
I’ve never won a grammy before. Is it a big deal or can I just show up in jeans and tshirt?
And who gets elected as King when I win? Me, or somebody else?
You don’t have to stop being a king to win a Grammy. Just overalls or workwear…
Undaroos it is then!
I’m totally gonna rock things up. Maybe I’ll even give an impromptu performance of my interpretation of cocaine bear.
Give the public what they want! I’m wearing denim dungarees…
Man, classing it up. They better not give you the King of the World award for that though. Or I’m totally going to have to slap you like a little girl.
If it makes for a good awards show, I’m in.
So, should I expect a pat on the back or a return slap? or something else?
A trapdoor and a long fall.
I couldn’t make any sense out of your synopsis, and I’m not blaming you. Not going to bother with this.
Robin Askwith?
Star of the Confessions films, surely you still have VHS of this under your bed?
I’ll have to take your word for his cultural prominence. But spelled different than the prime minister.
Was Robin Askwith prime minister back in the 70’s? Probably better than what we have now…thanks for the typo, I use these terms interchangably…
Yes. It’s often thought that his scapegrace, rebel persona led directly to the backlash of Thatcher.
He’s still alive, so quite possible swooping back to prominence…
And a profound atrabilious history…