It’s never been quite clear whether George Miller drives Mad Max or vice versa; the director’s other output suggests a rather different creative force from the popular post-apocalyptic franchise he’s best known for. Dancing penguins, talking pigs, vomiting New England witches, there’s a whimsical side to Miller that’s intermittently seen outside of the Thunderdome, but gets a full development in this dotty adaptation of a novella by AS Byatt. A magic-realist tale of a lovelorn djinn, it’s a weird and occassionally wonderful visual mood-piece that’s all about story and the meaning and importance of story, but unfortunately omits to pack one of its own.
Alithea Binnie (Tilda Swinton) is an expert on myth and storytelling who leaves London for a conference in Istanbul, where she has sinister visions in a lecture theatre and then finds a mysterious glass battle in a local bazaar. Inside the bottle is a djinn, played by Idris Elba with the joke-shop pointy ears that have been annoyingly prevalent recently in Avatar 2 and Black Panther; Wakanda Forever. Binnie doesn’t actually rub the lamp, she cleans it with an electric toothbrush in one of a number of neat narrative reversals that make Miller’s film just about watchable.
This is ‘a story about stories’. One’s heart sinks at the ease with some narratives proclaim themselves meta without much justification; it would be good to tell one story properly before announcing that you’re a master of the form. Binnie is a narratologist, so is wise to the djinn’s trickster game, preferring not to make wishes since the djinn’s mission is always corrective or at least ‘a cautionary tale’. So the djinn has to explain himself with a long and complicated multi-pack backstory which looks lush and stands in contrast to the tedious framing story about the djinn and Binnie exchanging placeholder dialogue in a hotel room, woodenly performed by Swinton and Elba.
Stories are told here, but the magic of drama does not emerge; Miller spends far more time on the mechanics of how to get a bottle through airport security than what should be the obvious centrepiece here, the coupling between human and an eternal spirit. Yes, there are monsters in the mix, we get a surprise trip to the Hadron Collider and an arresting musical interlude thanks to a Henson/Cronenberg instrument made of living creatures, but these details lead nowhere in particular and our main narrative craters with the lack of sexual tension between Elba and Swinton tangible throughout. ‘I find feelings through stories…’ says Binnie, ‘…they create meaning’. Wise words, but not particularly reflective of Miller’s lofty, high-minded, fancy-schmancy tale, which has striking music and creative visuals, but rarely manages to suggest anything resembling a living, breathing or meaningful story.
Some terrific images but the story gets lost. Tilda is good but Idris is bad. I felt duped though, expecting to see the George Miller who constantly told us he was miles better than that Mad Max stuff he was forced to do to keep his foot in the Hollywood door.
Miller’s talent is real, but his record is spotty. This is a lot of cash to spend on a fanciful tale with no obvious audience. It’s no Happy Feet.
They certanly under-estimated the potential audience.
Sounds like it feeld three thousand years long…
There are terrific moments in here, and I’d buy a Blu-ray just for them. But without a good, involving story to connect these moments, the feels were few and far between…
A 3 crope movie then.
Sigh. Crope it is.
Title sounds confusingly like a Chinese drama. Are there cherry blossoms?
It’s not even a sequel to One Hundred Years of Solitude…
Crope.
I’d rather eat a blueberry muffin, thank you very much. Or even go to work…
Let’s not go to extremes. Going to work should be a last resort…
I know. I guess I got caught up in the drama of the moment.
Sounds like a crope. I wonder what Miller thought he was getting at.
expect on myth, Iris Elba
Thanks for the typos, my mind is addled with this film. There’s some great moments, real imagination, but they seem to have cut the main idea from the book and they’re left with window-dressing.
Do you mean the soggy part of the cereal?