The title has several meanings; yes, this is a period piece, set in the 17th century, at the time of the restoration, and King Charles II (Sam Neill) is back on the English throne and Oliver Cromwell’s Puritanism is on the retreat. But this is a story of a personal restoration, that of Robert Merivel (Robert Downey Jr), a young medical student who is enlisted by the king to take care of his ailing dog. Merivel excels, and the King sees him as a cure-all for a number of personal maladies, not least, a romantic life that requires some unravelling. Merivel plays along, but it’s soon obvious that the King uses and abuses those he enlists, and Restoration’s action moves away from the royal court to a Quaker sanatorium, where Merivel falls for Katherine (Meg Ryan).
Rose Tremain’s novel is, inevitably, given something of a truncated treatment by Michael Hoffman’s film, which does a stunning job in terms of costumes and sets, but bites off more than anyone could chew in terms of her characters and plot. Nevertheless, Restoration is still a good deal smarter than most period films, taking a picaresque journey with Merivel as he falls out of favour with the King, but discovers a richer kind of lifestyle than he ever imagined.
Robert Downey Jr was always a natural performer, and does a great job in conveying Merivel’s youthful arrogance; he’s aided by a strong cast including David Thewlis as a fellow medic, Ian McKellen as his sidekick, and Hugh Grant as a rather pompous painter who Merivel has genuine contempt for. In fact, there’s a spikey-ness to all the characterisations that makes Restoration something of a pleasure; Restoration may not match up with Tremain’s book, but the observation of the corrupt world around Downey Jr’s character is refreshingly bitter.
Restoration won Oscars for set and costume design, but it’s no slouch when it comes to acting or plot. With a great cast, many of whom would go onto become household names, it’s an accessible period film that deserves to be exhumed; while not perfect, it restores the parts that other period dramas simply can’t reach.
Great cast. Downey and Ryan would make good sparring partners. Have a vague memory this got lost in initial release. Is this the Michael Hoffman of Restless Natives?
Same guy. His Midsummer Nights Dream wasn’t what the studio wanted, but a smart, literate director.
I liked Dream but his Gambit was miscast and mislaid.
Oh, Gambit was dreadful.
Yup.
Never read the book, so I wouldn’t feel let down. Do they talk about what the Restoration did to Shakespeare?
Not really, do you have memories of your own that you could share? Primary sources are rare these days…
I’m doing an oral history project, talking into a tape machine for some university kids, but we haven’t got up to the Restoration yet. Still talking about what a bore Queen Bess was.
What was Studs Terkel like in the old days?
What year was this released? I didn’t see it in the title like you normally have it.
Which shows up only when I view the post on your site actual, not in the reader or on the app.
I shall remember that now (hopefully)
yes and as we have to use the reader because commenting on your site is verboten so put the bliddy date back!
+1
It’s there!
Nope. Not in the title anyway.
When did you last see it in the title?
I didn’t silly! It’s not there!
I have screenshotted it from my phone’s Opera browser, which I use to check my daily quota of typos.
You can’t catch all the typos when they don’t show up as typos. I.e., “has a fellow medic.”
Did I say I did? I check that the quota of typos are there. I have to include so many a day…
Now if only you could put the dates back and fix the commenting function . . .
I screenshotted my screen and sent it to fraggle last night; hard proof that the problem is not at my end.
I thought you had Alex for that.
I’m only one man . . .
I have to include a minimum of 10 typos a day so that Alex can find at least five.
Very good of you.
So I have emailed it to you…
and I have to you.
And I have to you!
and I have to you again.
Thanks for the screenshot, no idea at all why it’s not appearing in the reader. Doing everything as I normally do. Full apologies and refunds will be provided.
Not to worry, I wasn’t going to watch this movie anyway.
In the interests of free speech, I’ll tighten up my system by adding backdated charges for every comment on this blog, maybe $8 a comment. Will work out the totals, but it’s all in the interest of free speech so it’s a good thing.
In yer dreams.
$8 that cost you missus.
Up yer bum.
$16 code violation for language.
and what? we are Murican now????
On behalf of the gals at Scottish Widows.
THEY CAN $**K MY @$$.
$32 for extreme language.
I live in Britain, and use pounds not dollars, so your charges mean nothing to me. Nothing, nada, zilch and zero. Pfft.
Exchange rate charges triggered for each comment since 2019.
You’re trying to get rid of me, I can tell.
Just monetizing my options as a provider of free speech opportunities!
Have to say it isn’t working.
Can’t put a price on free speech. Can I put you down for a 24 month pay plan?
Nope. Free means free!
Our Free plan has a special offer this month. If you can muster a cash deposit.