Yikes! The wheels have been loose for a while on JK Rowling’s proposed five-film sequence set in the Wizarding World of Harry Potter, but the third instalment rings plentiful changes in an effort to re-connect with audiences who seem to be rapidly falling out of love with the whole magical concept. Rowling’s advocacy for women’s rights seems to have alienated those who consume their news via Twitter sound-bites, star Johnny Depp has dropped out due to his own courtroom agonies, and Ezra Miller’s arrest for disorderly conduct, the latest in a series of threatening public behaviours, swiftly removed him out of the publicity whirl. In short, it’s been anything but a Wizarding World, but is the third instalment of the Harry Potter spin–off any good to watch?
Well, it’s the best of the three films so far, but that’s not saying a great deal. The opening film was little more than a busy prologue, but the leaden follow-up The Crimes of Grindelwald proved a turn-off for audiences, with little kid-friendly action and lots of gloomy foreshadowing of Depp as the franchise’s big bad. He’s been abruptly replaced as dark wizard villain Gellert Grindelwald by safe pair of hands Mads Mikkelsen, who we first in a café, meet sharing reminiscences about his gay past with his one-time lover Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law). For Rowling to lead the entire film by aggressively outing the sexual orientation of one of her characters feels like something is bent out of shape here. There wasn’t much evidence that being in the closet was part of Dumbledore’s make-up in the original films and the revelation feels somewhat tacked on and patronising. Dumbledore and Grindelward feud, although can’t actually fight due to some agreement, and caught in the middle of their stuttering conflict is Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne), his battered suitcase of silly creatures and various other characters (Jacob Kowalski? Tina Goldstein? Nope, me neither…) barely established in the first two films.
Probably the most coherent of the three Fantastic Beasts movie to date, David Yates’ film takes the action from China to Berlin to Bhutan via a few scenes in Hogwarts, but it all just looks like the usual standing-around-in-front-of-green -screen phoned-in read-throughs. The plusses here are Colleen Atwood’s immaculate costumes, the beasts, which do have a bit more magic to them that the menagerie featured in say Dolittle, a reprise of Maggie Smith’s schoolmistress character, now played by Fiona Glascott, and a character called Bunty. The minuses are far too many random characters, a deeply confusing narrative for novices, and a lack of much that might be considered kid friendly or family content; there’s no children’s angle on this complex and adult story of international intrigue and conspiracy, and it’s hard to see exactly who this film would please.
With banquet assassinations, election manipulation, necromancy, and wizarding war crimes to cover, the business of The Secrets of Dumbledore attempts to forge a fresh connection with Harry Potter fans who have grown up, but looks likely to only ensnare a dwindling percentage of that large audience. A few breadcrumbs for that audience may be enough to maintain their interest, but this feels like the last hurrah for a tent-pole franchise that was somewhat less than magical from the get-go.
This film made me appreciate Steve Kloves’ contributions to the main “Harry Potter” films … FB 2 was a narrative mess, and while FB 1 was fine, something was definitely missing with just JK writing.
JK, David Yates and Potter’s other directors also get a lot of credit, but so much of the on-screen magic of those movies hinges on Kloves’ screenplays, which are skillful adaptations that do a lot of the legwork for setting the tone for those films.
That’s interesting, it really sounds like Kloves was the unsung hero of this hugely popular franchise…FB2 really was awful…
What hand did JK Rowling actually have in this? Steve Kloves is given a co-credit for the screenplay. Whoever is to blame, it is just terrible.
I guess she makes up the outline, if not the dialogue.
It’s a screenplay by JK and Cloves based on a screenplay by JK. What that means I’ve no idea. Though she is down as the producer. Can’t believe she thought an election would go down well with a fantasy audience.
I can. Or at least I can believe that she wanted to engage in more adult themes. Would have been better to create a different franchise to do it, doesn’t fit with this at all…
If this is a bid to make kids more politically aware, she chose the wrong vehicle.
She has her grown up books she writes as Robert Galbraith. Put it there. I get that the Potter audience have grown up, but this kind of half-cooked political metaphor won’t fly.
And the Galbraith books are enormous like the final ones in the Potter series as if no editor is able to say “stop”.
Good review, probably won’t watch this. Never got interested in the series.
Is the correct answer. By the sound of it, most of us are in the same boat with this…
Harry Pfft. Nope to all of it.
This is the correct answer!
….why are all the Harry Potter movies so aggressively boring?
Is the correct question. Not sure what the answer is, but the notion behind the question is correct. No explosions or flying motorbikes.
Welllll….actually aren’t there flying cars? And there’s a flying car chasing a train in one, I’m positive. So theoretically they should pass The First Test of the Riders.
But genuinely, the main-series movies seem to me to be just…completely, utterly lacking in energy. They’re a chore to watch. And your review of this movie made my eyes glaze over. (The movie’s doing, not yours! 🙂 ) It sounds completely without redeeming value for time spent.
I actually preferred this film to any of the Harry Potter films, which were all the same and as slow as a week in the jail. I guess they satisfied their audience, but seemed dull as dishwater to me, and you too by the sound of it.
5 films? That’s ridiculous. Have to admit, I hope this is the one that kills this movie franchise.
What’s Depp allegedly done now? It seems like he’s always in court about something or other…
Still trying to save his reputation in court, which seems like it’s causing more probaems for him than staying quiet.
Your wish may well come true….
I’m proud of the fact that I’ve seen none of the Harry Potter movies, nor any of these Fantastic Beasts ones. And I never will. Is this something adults are now supposed to enjoy? Pass.
Are you doing anything special for Alex Good Friday?
You can cheerful skip the lot, it’s hard going if you don’t know your Muggles from your Mugwumps.
I dodn’t believe that Alex Good should only be celebrated once a year; every day is a Good day on this website!
Well, it’s always a party going on here.
The Long (Alex) Good Friday?
Only with a happy ending.
An Alex Good Old Fashioned Orgy?
It’s an Alex Good Life, if You Don’t Weaken.
Alex Good Vibrations.
The Alex Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
Ice Cold in Alex Good
Alex Good Night, and Alex Good Luck
Feel Alex Good Inc by Gorillaz
It Was An Alex Good Day by Ice Cube
You’re No Alex Good by Linda Ronstadt
Alex Good Alex Golly Alex Miss Alex Molly by Little Alex Richard
I Bet You Look Like Alex Good on the Dancefloor by the Arctic Monkeys
You Give Love an Alex Good Name by Alex Bonne Jovi
Alex Good Times. Dy-no-mite!
Alex Too Good To Be Forgotten by Bananarama