The title refers to a coastal town in Japan, where fishermen brought home their catch unaware that they were bringing mercury poisoning to their dinner tables, and their families, a human catastrophe, a man-made ecological disaster. That’s a tough subject to bring to a mainstream audience, although films as diverse as Erin Brockovich and Dark Waters have made a decent fist of it with the help of some star power. For Minamata, director Andrew Levitas wins a watch in the form of Johnny Depp, perhaps glad to see the back of his Disney heyday, and happy to immerse himself in the kind of star turn that brings this drama to life.
Eugene Smith is a name that most photography fans will recognise for such noted snaps as the famous Dewey Defeats Truman picture, or the County Doctor photo-essay that founded a genre. But by 1971, Smith was something of a mess, a wayward talent without a subject to address. Played by Depp, Smith relishes his vices in the form of cigarettes and amphetamines, but his bad habits come under threat when he agrees to travel to Japan and document the on-going story in Minamata. The Cisso corporation has been putting profits before people for several decades by the time Smith arrives, and despite many substantial obstacles and set-backs, Smith is determined not to let Robert Hayes (Bill Nighy) his editor at Life magazine down…
Minamata plays and wins at the ‘white saviour’ game; yes, Smith comes to the rescue of a local community, but David Kessler’s script plays down the protagonist’s involvement with the struggle in the second half of the film. In the first half, there’s some crowd-pleasing moments, notably when Smith makes a daring escape from a hospital on a stretcher, but such derring-do becomes less of a factor as the Japanese community rise up to take on their corporate oppressor, and Smith plays a small but crucial role in capturing their cause on film, rather than leading it himself. That’s an important distinction, and one that puts Minamata in an elevated position as a drama; despite an engaging surface, the film never settles for sloganeering and easy victories, and even the end-titles are a bitter-sweet read.
The subject is important, but it shouldn’t be forgotten that Depp is the draw here, and he doesn’t let the side down. It’s not make-up or prosthetics that make Smith a convincing character, it’s Depp’s skill; a key line of dialogue mentions that the great photographer does not carry any pictures of his own kids, and Depp fashions something compelling and redemptive about Smith’s search for a comprehensible truth that he can capture through the lens. Released yesterday in the UK, Minamata has not yet been distributed in the largest market of the US, and that’s a scandal in itself; this is a smart, moving film illuminated by a big star performance, and one might hope that the public won’t allow such a stirring film to be censured for political convenience.
MINAMATA is in UK cinemas and on digital now (Aug 2021).
Thanks to Vertigo and Premier for access.
I have the impression I’ve seen a film on this subject before and certainly it is worth covering the story again. Glad to see Depp is working and that he can demonstrate his great acting abilities, which were often thrown away in a slew of post-Pirates blockbusters.
Looks like a neat film. Bet Depp’s glad to have gotten out of Pirates of the Caribbean.
No paragraphs today? Following Alex’s lead?
Just four; I read my piece on a separate browser to make such no Alex-type humiliation occurs.
Ah, yes, the internet shows otherwise. You got off this time, chump.
I screenshotted Alex’s daily catastrophe for future reference. We can learn from the mistakes of others.
That sounds useful. Any screenshots of screenshots of dead people in baths? Surely that’s worse than just plan screenshots of dead people in baths…
I think Alex makes these screenshots for his own personal use, and the quiz provides him with a vague pretexts.
Do you think the Canadian government is hacking into his computer? That’s why he uses the quiz? Alex tells me they do have a keen interest in him…
He’s certainly on a watch list. Quite a volatile character, much like yourself. It’s hard to prove his criminality.
Alright, kiddo, we were having a nice little chat insulting Alex and you just had to throw one at me, didn’t you? I’ll show you how’s volatile…
How’s volatile? Hahaha! Muppet!
Who’s volatile! Who’s!
Too late! The world laughs at you!
The world really has reached a new low.
You certainly showed us how’s volatile! Haha Roaster!
Is despair in your vocabulary? Despair?
No need for despair in the face of such a veritable how’s how of volatility!
Alright, calm down Dr Suess. Don’t think your thousands of avid readers will be able to understand those big words.
Haha, what a lesson you have delivered today!
What lesson? What lesson?!
‘Let’s just see that again in slow motion…’ Alright, kiddo, we were having a nice little chat insulting Alex and you just had to throw one at me, didn’t you? I’ll show you how’s volatile…’
Oft! Pick that one out!
And what’s the moral of this story?
There’s no defending the literary atrocities of Alex Good. Now be off before I start reaching to my top pocket for cards…
Pfft. I’m going already!
This is going on my list. Yep.
Is the correct answer.
Geo-restrictions are ridiculous nowadays. There is simply no need for them.
Totally agree. Anything other than same day release invites pirates.
And we all know it, which is why it boggles me that the big companies choose to ignore this when it doesn’t suit them.
Despite the Pirates of the Carribean, Depp is still a big name draw here in the US and people would watch this streaming just to see him.
Sometimes I wonder how/when decisions like this get made. I’d like to be a fly on the wall in such a meeting just to hear the various thoughts that make it happen. Because I can’t conceive of such a thought process on my own.
This is a strong film. I hope US audiences get that they’re having their freedom to choose removed by cancel culture. It utterly defeats any kind of common sense to make this impossible for US audiences to legally see.