What’s so good about Stephen King’s killer dog movie? Few writers have the willingness to immerse themselves in the detail of their characters and location that King does, and King’s ability to ground a horror conceit in domestic purgatory is very much to the fore in the film of Cujo, a film that’s become a household name for rabid dogs, but is rather less frequently spotted on tv and streaming.
Cujo is, famously, the killer dog featured here, but there’s no much Cujo in the first half of Lewis Teague’s film, bar an intro which shows the mutt being bit on the nose by a rabid bat. Instead, Teague’s film gets into the minutiae of one particular cell of the Castle Rock organism; Donna (Dee Wallace) has decanted from New York, her husband Vic (Daniel Hugh-Kelly) who is struggling with an advertising account gone rogue. Meanwhile her lover Steve (Christopher Kemp) beats her husband at tennis, runs down the street shirtless and doesn’t take it well when Donna dumps him.
If that’s not enough, we then get into Donna and Vic’s car trouble, and their attempts to get their shonky Ford Pinto into shape, which involve mechanic Joe Camber (the great Ed Lauter) and his family. All of these characters are extremely well described, and as a film, Cujo generates a heap of suspense before working out exactly how Donna’s life is going to fall apart. If there’s not much Cujo in the first half, the second half is all Cujo, and Donna and her son are trapped agonisingly in the confines of the Pinto while the rabid dog rampages outside.
If audiences were perhaps underwhelmed by the intensity of the latter stages of the story, the not-quite-terrifying dog make-up, or the less than satisfying ending, the majority of Teague’s film is way ahead of its time, respecting King’s characters and setting, while doubling down on intensity. Before he became a notable directorial talent, Jan De Bont does a great job with the look of the film, making something iconic of Donna’s Pinto in the abandoned yard and predating his excellent work on Die Hard and Speed amongst other films.
The name Cujo is still often bandied around when naughty dogs are mentioned, and Cujo the movie is probably ripe for a CGI-heavy remake; if anyone goes down that road, it would be ideal if they constructed the long, careful, patient build-up King and Teague manage here. Cujo the dog seems to feed off Castle Rock’s bad energy, and there’s far more to King’s story than just a woman in peril.
King’s entire oeuvre is basically an examination of small-town life and ordinary characters and this works well because rabid dog stays in the background for so long. Great to see Dee Wallace get a rare starring role.
Cujo is definitely a Stephen King movie I need to rewatch to fully appreciate it. I only saw it once on TV years ago, but I know I’ll probably get more out of it if I see it again.
I didn’t care for this when I saw it on bbc1 in the 80’s, just wanted to get on with the action; looking back, that first hour does a nice job of capturing the feel of King’s writing….
I was about 50/50 with the majority of King’s books. I think I managed 2 movies? While gruesomely scary, the visuals were still more than I could handle.
Was the remake of IT a success? If it was, it wouldn’t surprise me if this was remade soon too.
I’d imagine his whole catalogue is constantly rebooting. Movies are a bit hit and miss, but King certainly has the ideas and the style to make things compelling on the page.
Do you know, has he ever directed?
Maximum Overdrive. It’s quite something.
That’s the one where the machines come alive, right? With the actor from the Mighty Ducks and Mario?
I think I saw the start of that….
That is indeed the rich text I refer to.
Another interesting one. Love King, and always glad to see when his books are faithfully adapted – you know my feelings when they aren’t.
So when I was a teenager, I was just….hurry up and get to the dog. But as an older and wiser man, I really dig the intricate build up, which reflects the way King sets up his environment. It’s one of the better takes on King.
Good to hear. A second one to add to the list!
??? completely crapped out on the ending -Tad- does not equate to a faithful adaptation. They wimped out.
The Shining completely ducks the ending too. Don’t remember any lack of punch in the reading.
Haven’t seen The Shining, I liked The Dead Zone and Christine better as movie adaptations. And Firestarter thinking about it. Cujo not so much.
They may have changed the ending, but, unlike some of the films that have been adapted from his books, at least it resembled his writing for the most part.
…is the correct answer. That multi-character, interlocking feel is there from the start….
Do love it when Ed Lauter turns up in a movie. He was magic in Magic and fab in Family Plot. So this being added to the to watch pile now.
I’m declaring July 21st International Ed Lauter today, and today’s film schedule is dedicated to the great man himself…
Sounds like a plan, here is my contribution from Finland (and there are more on the blog!) Noticed you’ve done in him in Rollerball too… if you ever feel like running a blogathon on him let me know! https://weegiemidget.wordpress.com/2019/11/15/films-magic-1978/
I guess Ed Lauter mania is sweeping the globe right now. Rewatched Magic for the internet time, and it’s great. Although like some of your commenters, I think the book may be even better. The film…is only one way to tackle that story, and Goldman’s backstory is choice. Great review!
Thanks, I have got the book and it’s on the to read pile so keep your eyes peeled on my blog.