Neither as good as the makers hoped, nor as bad as the reputational stink created by a belated release, Joe Wright’s The Woman in the Window finally arrives on Netflix like rubbish coming down the chute. Producer Scott Rudin has been undergoing a trial by social media, there have been clear issues in adapting AJ Finn’s bestseller in the Gone Girl/Girl On A Train genre, and while the final product is intriguing, it falls somewhat short of the Hitchcockian ideals the creative forces are aiming for.
Amy Adams toplines as Dr Anna Fox, who still talks to the dead husband and child she lost in a car accident. Anna now lives in a cavernous New York brownstone but has developed an understandable fear of going outside. When she’s not re-watching Rear Window and Spellbound, both of which are featured in clips, Anna is developing an unhealthy interest in her neighbours across the street, the Russell family. Is high-powered finance-whizz Alistair Russell (Gary Oldman) all he’s cracked up to be? What secret is Alistair’s son hiding? And who is the mysterious woman (Julianne Moore) who visits Anna after she’s pelted with eggs by Halloween-celebrating kids? A mix of prescription drugs and wine won’t help Anna sort it out as her view on things is continually questioned by cops investigating what Anna thinks is a murder….
Of course, we’ve been down this road many times before, notably the 1995 thriller Copycat which revolves around a similarly agoraphobic heroine hiding from a serial killer. There are mental health issues touched on here, but they come second to delivering the large slabs of exposition required to turn the plot around. Writer Tracy Letts, who also has an extended cameo, doesn’t seem to have responded well to the thematic strength of the venerable clichés involved; Anna is like a Hitchcockian heroine, but ends up just standing there while various characters explain themselves. Oldman seems to be there as a favour to Wright or Netflix, while Wyatt Russell makes more than is required in a thankless role as Anna’s lodger, who patiently explains various plot-points in a way that makes The Woman in the Window feel like an inconclusive script meeting.
One of the last of the 20th Century Fox films in development when Disney took over, The Woman in the Window is a reasonable time-passer by dint of an over-qualified cast and a tried-and-tested story. But just about passing muster as a tv movie can’t be what this kind of talent envisaged; like Anna, the viewer may feel they’ve been gas-lit by the whole enterprise. It would seem impossible to make a film about being afraid to leave your house, and release it in the middle of a pandemic, and not hit any seams of metaphorical interest, but somehow The Women in the Window manages it. There’s nothing to do here but spot the killer, and there’s not even much choice; like the reputation of the novel that it’s taken from, Wright’s thriller seems like a rather busted flush.
I will give it a watch. Great review
The star power makes it worth a look, for sure.
Thanks for this review. I never had any expectations and also not to mention the fact that the “original” book by Finn is a shameless plagiarism of another – Saving April by Sarah Denzil. I wrote an article on that more than a year back now.
I’ll check out your article, Diana. There are no original ideas, but there does seem to be a real stink around this book. There’s homage and tribute, and then there’s just having no ideas of your own.
Thanks! And, I only wish I was talking only about original and non-original ideas in my article! I actually presented examples of RE-WRITTEN and ALMOST WORD-FOR-WORD passages copied 🙂
Really? That is astonishing. Amazed that a veteran producer like Rudin would pay top dollar for something so clearly plagiarised. Will check your article as soon as I get home, as a writer, I’m annoyed to hear of this!
Yes, check it out please if you are interested and I would love to know your opinion if you’d be in the mood to share feedback. I mean, the publisher of the book by Finn was actually his ex-employer. And, the man was actually known as a serial liar before, talking to press that he had cancer when he never did, etc. etc.
So there is Rear Window. Then Disturbia. Now this? I can’t say that I’m impressed.
I wouldn’t be. And the whole thing seems to have been ripped of from another novel, so probably just as well it blew up in their faces…
The thing, I like Amy Adams. So while I know that actors and actresses don’t conform to my mental image of them, it’s still a disappointment.
I’m a fan too, but there’s not much she can do with this, the material is seriously flawed.
Gave up on this once an over-the-top Gary Oldman starting screaming in her face. Didn’t even think Adams who is usually excellent was much good either. The book seemed too clever for its own good and too difficult to adapt.
Just sounds like a Rear Window rip off to me.
It is.
Well what was the point in that then?
Don’t ask me, I didn’t green light this!
Why not? Storm into the offices of Netflix and demand the job of CEO. They’d be stupid to turn you down.
You might think so, but better to be outside the tent, hurling abuse at those inside.
But wouldn’t you rather be inside throwing abuse? Much easier throw.
Better trajectory from outside.
Let’s agree to disagree.
This is the 2nd review of this movie and says the same more or less so I won’t be bothered with it.
Where was the first?
One of the other movie blogs I follow.
Nothing on Alex’s blog about it.
No someone else’s blog. There are 3 others I follow as well as you two.
Surely you get everything you need from me and Alex?
Mostlyish, but the others I followed before you so I’m not junking them. Also it’s good to get a concensus when it happens.
What did they think of King John?
The 1899 one or the 2016 one?
I think it’s the one Alex saw in 1899.
No he’s a one off
And the green eyed monster approaches…
Where?
You!
What, I am a monster? I think not!
Shedley’s diary disagrees.
It’s a fake.
Written by who? Netflix?
Tony Gilroy
Well that explains that.
Tracy Letts founds Shedley’s story too emotional to script effectively.
I’ll probably watch it. I won’t like it, but I’ll probably watch it. There’s a basic problem with plots that become so complex they have to spend most of their time explaining themselves, like they’re breaking some kind of law of physics.
I think Tony Gilroy did the re-writes here, but it makes The Girl on the Train look elusive and ambigious; in this story, everything is nailed down again and again, at the expense of just about everything else. The plot doesn’t seem complex at all once you work it out, it’s just the presentation is confusing. Part of that is due to an unreliable narrator, but her unreliability doesn’t add much.
Well, that does sound like a mess.
The should have set it inside your mouth.
My mouth is clean. I’m not the one spending 99p on a trip to the hygienist.
The gave me a copy of The Hunt for Red October, what more do you want?
Fluoride?
No, but I’m hoping that the Safdie brothers will shot their new film in my left ear canal. Fraggle is doing the camerawork.
I imagine Fraggle has some good ear pictures. I hope that is a prompt for one of her weekly posts coming up.
People say my ears look a bit like Brad Pitt’s.
Would love to talk, but Wes Anderson has a crew shooting in my nasal cavities at the moment, and I’ve got catering responsibilities.
I think they said your eyes looked like pits, but I can see how the mistake could happen.
I do have some great ear pictures. I always take pictures if someone turns up with something wrong so they can email it to their doctor.
Would they make good films?
No I just take a picture, no time to shilly shally about pretending to be Tarantino. Anyways the ear canal isn’t very big, not much room to manoeuvre a camera.
Maybe just a tv show or a short film in my ear canal?
Sure I’ll cost it up and send you a quote, warning- I don’t negotiate, the price is the price.
Ballpark figure? Scorsese says he can do one for twenty quid.
Oh I’d go with him then. I’m not undervaluing my time and expertise.
So how much more would your services cost?
Well, how much are 5 star hotel rooms a night up there in Blenfield or whatever your town is called?
What’s a hotel?
Ah. Well that’s the end of that then.