We haven’t had a good hate-watch for a while, but the 1973 version of Lost Horizon raises the hackles from the get-go. Sure, the early 70’s was the progressive era of Cabaret, The Godfather and The French Connection, but it was also an retro time that turned unsuccessfully to Old Hollywood for inspiration, and producer Ross Hunter’s success with the Airport movies suggested that a return to that grand style would chime with audiences hungry for nostalgia. Fortunately for everyone, paying punters stayed away in droves, leaving Lost Horizon as a verboten, boarded-up Shangri-La for contrarians like myself to revel in the on-screen idiocies.
The plot is familiar enough. Richard Conway (Peter Finch) leads a party of Westerners from a war-torn airstrip to another war-torn airstrip, and then eventually into a plane crash which strands the group in the mountains. There they find the world of Shangri-La, and who better to preside over this happy world than Chang, played by the famous Chinese actor Sir John Gielgud. Some of Conway’s group are still wrestling with malaise, notably Catherine (Sally Kellerman). When she contemplates suicide from her room’s balcony, wily old Chang busts in and somehow finds the soothing words that any despairing woman would want to hear, and she’s quickly talked round.
Charles Jarrot’s film wasn’t just a bad musical; it pretty much killed the tradition of the all-singing, all-dancing road-show presentation, a money-spinner from the days of Mary Poppins and The Sound of Music. These films were less than a decade old, but the magic had gone in the wake of The Graduate and Easy Rider and a general sense of counter-cultural malaise. Lost Horizon puts one wrong foot after another as it tries to pour new wine into old bottles; Burt Bacharach is a great song-writer, but his work here feels terrible. Songs like Russell Crowe look-alike Bobby Van’s mind-scrambling Question Me An Answer? and anodyne anthem Living Together, Growing Together have all the relaxing quality of tin foil between teeth, and Bacharach himself felt that the film nearly ended his career. Stars like Peter Finch and George Kennedy clearly don’t have the chops to perform, with Kennedy not vocalising at all, and Finch’s voice overdubbed while the actor prowls around the set closed-mouthed. In fact, most of the cast don’t actually perform when it comes to the music; as Bette Midler quipped ‘I never miss a Liv Ullmann musical’. This makes for a long, tedious wait until Michael York finally and unwisely decides to take his new girlfriend back to civilisation with him…
Amazon may have over-estimated my interest in Lost Horizon by trying to flog me a hard-back copy for the less than competitive price of £145. To be fair, this version does eventually regurgitate an interesting moral about the fragility of happiness, but the weight of the film is so soul-crushing, it’s tempted to feel elated just because it’s over. A farce, a farrago, and a disaster, Lost Horizon has the reputation of a complete turkey, and even the most revisionist viewer can only reach the same conclusion; this ain’t no Shangri La….
Thank god we still have Capra :))
And thank goodness Capra never had to feature Bobby Van…
Ah, just found out Olivia Dukakis died today, she was in this movie, but did a lot of better movies.
Moonstruck was the best one.
I did like that movie.
You should be praised for your endurance in watching this right to the end. Now I don’t have to risk it.
I went up the North Face, and completed this in the third attempt. Don’t try without a local Sherpa, played by Sir John Gielgud.
I actually prefer this version to the original, which has not aged well. 73 version has a great cast, and is sincere and loopy and innocent.
Cheers for this comment! I knew someone would find some good in this! I also found that the original to be somewhat short of the stone cold classic that it was once heralded as, so maybe adding songs wasn’t the worst idea here. And I can’t disagree that this is a terrific cast, my caveat would be that it’s not a great cast for a musical. And I can’t argue about the loopiness, I’d forgotten about the high-NRG dance-routines of Shangri-la ceremonies. I guess that fact that I watched the whole thing indicates that there’s something to be said for this expensive production.
I don’t know, 145 doesn’t sound too bad. I could buy groceries for 2 weeks or this movie. Hmmmm, tough call.
I’m pretty sure it was £750 the first time I looked. You get get more groceries for that.
Wow, that’s a HUGE discount. 750 down to 145.
Now I feel guilty if I buy it because it’s such a steal. Probably taking money out of orphans’ mouths or something…
Give me £750 and I’ll get you a copy of the book on Kindle for 65p
I don’t think I’d trust you with 750.
Let’s start lower, like one penny (or whatever the scottish equivalent is)
I’ll take the cash from your checking account.
I don’t think my bank allows 1 penny transfers.
£750 it is then.
I don’t allow 750 transfers.
I’d say you’re stuck in the classic quandary. If only Dr Pavlov were here to rescue you.
but he isn’t. So you’re on your own. Maybe if you watch this movie 750 times that will make the cost come down.
I’ll take a round $1000 then.
You’re going to watch Lost Horizon 1000 times to really get your money’s worth?
I don’t know whether to stand in awe at such purposefulness of spirit or laugh at such a foolhardy action.
I’ll take it from your joint account then.
You and I don’t have a joint account.
Whatchu talkin’ ’bout Willis?
You and Mrs B.
We don’t trust someone who won’t eat Lucky Charms.
Makes us question your scottishness.
Wut? I have eaten Lucky Charms. Now send me the long and short numbers from your debit card, and the three numbers on the back.
Yeah right. I want proof you’ve eaten Lucky Charms. I won’t accept anything less than it being confirmed by the hosts of Radio Scotland or whatever that radio show you semi-regularly go on.
Instagram and twitter and other pictorial social sites will be accepted depending on how I’m feeling about them at the moment.
I know what they taste like. Now, numbers, please!
And what do they taste like?
Cereal. Fruit loops.
….is not the correct answer!
You win a pair of sackcloth boxer briefs. Enjoy!
Where are these briefs?
I’m guessing they’re hanging out with those mythical Lady’s Tights you’re always promising….
Ladies Tights, please.
Potayto, Potahto….
No, tights. I don’t have the budget for you to win potatoes.
Yikes – the improper use of a semi colon in the last sentence really put me off this one.
The atrocious editing on this blog is one of its charms.
The atrocious writing and numb-skull thinking on yours keeps me coming back to gawk at the idiocy.
You stealing my lines and using them uncredited on other inferior blogs really puts me off too.
Hey, you should take it as praise that I stole your line. It was a very good line.
Write your own, Bunty!
Uh, okay…
Today is a beautiful day; a beautiful day it is today.
And that’s how you use a semi colon! Boom!
If you’re in primary 2, yes, not if you’re blessed with Joyce-ian abilities like myself.
Well excuse me, Shakespeare. You proud of your three minute feature film of King John having a baby moose? I think not.
Ahem: scones, scones, beautiful scones – made with love and sweetened with lard; Dix, Dix, unruly Dix – made for sin and deserves a red card.
Boom!
If that comment is the measure of your writing, then you’ve got bigger problems than semi-colons.
Exactly – that’s why I have to steal your work. Do you understand now?
All too clearly.
Yep. And that’s the end of that.
OK, going out to help Alex with his bins, think he’s fallen in again.
It’s because of all those red cards. Have fun!
;
;
Well I’m glad I missed this one. Sounds travestical! A resounding nope!
Is the correct answer. I try and see good in everything and everyone, but I ran onto the rocks here.
And yet somehow you keep missing all the good in me . . .
I don’t have a microscope…
Not even a junior science starter kit microscope? Sad.
You SAID you’d gone of to the Shangri-La for trash humpers that are your bins? What are you doing here? Clear off, Bunty!