One should not judge a book by it’s cover, and nor should we judge a film by its subject. A number of elements came together to make this critic unenthused about watching this 2018 film from writer/director Tim Mielants, who worked on Peaky Blinders. For a start, it’s set in a naturist colony. While there are films which have amused by riffing on this kind of location, notably Blake Edwards’ A Shot in the Dark, naturism is more often seen by film-makers as ripe for tatty exploitation; it seems like an activity best enjoyed in peace rather than on the end of an intrusive lens. And the trailer, featuring missing hammers and sharp wood-work equipment, raises fears of violence; a combination of aging flesh, shrivelled genitals and potential gore didn’t inspire.
But Patrick gets a UK release from the Anti-Worlds imprint which has provided some invigorating cinema this year, so we soldier on to find that Patrick is a much more enjoyable film than might be expected. Played by Kevin Janssens, Patrick is a handyman who is generally content with his life in a Belgian holiday park, until one of his beloved hammers goes missing. Much like Pee Wee Herman and his search for his bike, Patrick’s search for a missing object puts him on a long and lonely path, bringing him into conflict with the world round about him. And that world is complex; there’s a whole lot of sex, deception and general skull-duggery going inside the camp, and while nothing is hidden in terms of physical bodies, there’s a corrupt underbelly that Patrick can’t help but find himself on a collision course with.
Patrick is a defiantly odd film, and most certainly not for everyone. Flight of the Conchorcds star Jermaine Clement turns up as Dustin Apollo, a passing rock-star hoping for some quiet time, and using the same artfully-posed guitar technique that Peter Sellers once used to cover his dignity in A Shot in the Dark. But although Clement’s performance is broadly drawn, Patrick isn’t a comedy, or if it is, it’s in the dark tragi-comedy vein of Lars von Trier’s The Idiots. Instead, it’s a parable about societal distrust, as Patrick’s hammer turns out to have been used for a real attack, and the handyman has to find the real culprit to clear his name.
Perhaps the audience has to self-select for a film like this, but if you can handle the concept, Patrick plays out in a way that’s actually quite compelling. Even if the sight of various human bodies undressed might seem unappetising, the viewer eventually settles down to focus on the actual story, which has a satisfying resolution that makes the journey worthwhile. Easily-offended viewers should beware, but this is a neat addition to the growing Anti-Worlds catalogue, and should help develop a cult following.
Thanks to Zoe Flower and Anti-Worlds for advance access to this title.
Patrick is out now (Jan 2022) on blu-rayin the UK. Link and trailer below.
https://anti-worldsreleasing.co.uk/pages/patrick
Just to be clear, “naturists” ARE nudists, right? I don’t want to get terms wrong here before saying anything.
Yes, your assertion is correct.
Ok. Then NOPE.
Definitely not for me.
I’m strangely intrigued by this one, not from your review of course, but the trailer definitely. But I wouldn’t pay £4.99 so it’s going to be a financial NOPE.
Now that is a ninja move, giving with one hand, yet giving back with the other. Classic Fraggle!
Taking a bow 🤣
Hmm…No Fraggle Nope yet. As I was promoted yesterday to a Nope Master Blue Belt (a proud achievement😅😅) I’m at least not going to steal thunder here from the Master by saying it..so I’ll just go with erm…No…(sorry this one is just not for me😅😅)
I can’t believe people come on this SERIOUS blog to bestow honourary degrees in saying NOPE! So you’re in fraggle’s gang now, eh? Your achievement is nothing! You have won NOTHING! I will not have this blog disrespected by such tomfoolery1
Why do I feel like I’m all of a sudden back in Karate Kid🤔🤔🤔
I feel like that every day…
Pfft.
As a registered Blue Belt Nope master you are entitled to Nope whenever you like, in fact it’s necessary in order to move on to the next belt.
Hm… I shall double my efforts🤔🤔😅😅😂😂
-wut? Don’t go over to the dark side, don’t listen to her promises! She’s hooking you in and trying to discredit our ironing blog, as if that was possible…
😅😅 I’m torn between becoming an Ironing and Nope master…why can’t I just be both? 🤔🤔🤔😂😂😂
Wax on, wax off…so many questions from a novice! The way to enlightenment offers many distractions, but the true ironing master is sure of purpose…
Darn. I thought this was going to be a review of Patrick (1978).
That was quite a freaky movie; there’s also a cute dog movie called Patrick from the same year as this one, very confusing…
Yeah, I like the ’70s Patrick. Haven’t seen these others, but I like cute dog movies.
Knock yourself out!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VB5cV1VQKz4
No Beverly Hills Chihuahau though…
Hmph. Not into pugs. Or chihuahuas. Don’t care for small dogs much at all. I’m more a Beethoven kind of guy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gz3tv6NKDPM
Pudsey looks sort of cute, but he’s no Air Bud.
This is the classic though:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85A2rWA5O3o
Air Bud better than Bemji?
Yeah. I’m a big-dog fellow. My last two were Newfs. Before that a Bouvier, a Pyrenees, and a Saint. I like a dog I can hug, and that doesn’t have to go out dressed in a sweater.
Great, So glad we had this talk, setting a great example of cineastes really getting to the core of today’s cinema.
Every film reviewer should be honest about their prejudices. We all have them.
I’ll start posting pictures of my cats Joe and Jake to add fuel this this debate…
Cat pictures. It’s what the Internet was made for!