Winner of my 2020 ‘what did I just watch?’ award, this re-issue from the BFI is an obscurity that would leave even the most seasoned film-critic scratching his head. Arriving in time for Halloween, this is a horror movie, of a sort, but one with a history that makes it sound as dangerous as the video-tape in The Ring. The film-maker involved, John Parker, never made another film. It was banned for over a decade by New York censors who declared it ‘inhuman, indecent, and the quintessence of gruesomeness.’ It was shown at only one cinema before disappearing. Most reference books contain no mention of it, and it’s almost like a ghost film that doesn’t exist. And yet you’ve almost certainly seen part of it, since a clip from the film, re-edited as Daughter of Horror, insidiously appears during Steve McQueen’s The Blob. Dare you risk your sanity by drinking from the poisoned chalice that is John Parker’s Dementia?
Producer Jack H Harris would later buy, re-edit the film and release it as Daughter of Horror, but the original version is the real draw here, and no, it’s nothing to do with the elderly. This is a film that even David Lynch might consider nightmare fuel, a POV view of a world of gloopy surrealism, a shattered mind pictured from the inside. The main character, described in the credits as The Gamine, is played by Adrienne Barrett, and the film ends and begins with her waking up in a seedy LA hotel room. She wanders outside, ignores a child sitting on the stairs, and dodges a dispute with her quarrelling neighbours. She allows herself to be mistaken for a prostitute and rides in a car with a rich man, listed as Rich Man in the credits and played by Bruno Ve Sota. But when they arrive at his apartment, the Gamine’s sanity seems to take leave of its moorings, and violence seems to break out. Or does it? A corpse, a necklace, a series of unsolved murders, a packed nightclub; is the Gamine the prey, or the predator?
Many of the popular films of 1953 are unwatchable by today’s standards; Dementia’s collection of shock tactics feel decidedly modern, and the film has remake potential. But even a remake would find it hard to summon the other-wordly feel of Parker’s film, with jolting tone changes and jarring edits that make you question what you’re watching. Did I mention that there’s no dialogue at all? There’s so much strange stuff going on that the absence of speech barely registers as unusual. And this isn’t a film that features violence to women; the sense of threat feels real throughout, but it’s not the usual slasher trope, rather more something more unique and sinister. Everything seems off in this world, from the newspaper seller to the cops; an utterly bizarre pair of early dream sequences establishes the violent ends of the Gamine’s parents, and the horror is more like that of a recurring nightmare from which the viewer cannot wake. And the ending packs a real punch.
The BFI clean-up offers an ideal platform for assessment, with an effective commentary by critic Kat Ellinger, the risible alternate cut that is Daughter of Horror, plus a wry potted explanation of the film’s history by Joe Dante. But even after Dementia has been parsed and nailed down, the meaning and the experience remain elusive. If you’re looking for something a little more intellectual than the usual jump scares this Halloween, John Parker’s Dementia is well worth a shot. The great comedy film-maker Preston Sturges has a unlikely quote on the front saying that the film ‘stirred my blood… purged my libido’, and he’s not wrong; this is a trip to be sure, and Dementia is one film that you won’t forget in a hurry, no matter how you try.
The BFI present Dementia in a new Blu-ray/DVD release from 19 October 2020 with simultaneous release on iTunes and Amazon Prime.
Thanks to the BFI for providing early access to this title.
I’m sold! So very interested in this now! Thanks for the rec 🙂 Great review!
It’s a BFI release here, but may well turn up on streaming at some point; I’d never heard of it, but now I’m a fan!
No dialogue at all? Okay, now I’m even more interested in this one. I’ll check it out after I get through my RBHF list, which is winding down. We’re halfway to Halloween! Thanks for the rec!
You’re welcome! This one is quite a find!
so, no dialogue for the entire movie? That’s just wrong. Words are important!
No dialogue. But the singing voice of Marni Nixon, who provided the voice for West Side Story and My Fair Lady. But no dialogue…there’s narration in the recut but it’s laughable…
Singing, ugh. That’s almost worse than no dialogue! I guess I just can’t win with this movie…
That’s what Psychic Grandma thought you’d say!
Dang that Psychic Grandma, still causing me problems! I swear, I’m going to call that all-girl group of Ghostbusters. THEN we’ll see who’s the barger litch!
She’d see it coming, she always does!
And if she fought the ghostbusters, my money’s on Grandma (as much as it pains me to admit that). She’s one tough old bird…
“Quintessence of Gruesomeness” is going to be the name of my metal band.
The Stygian Witches is mine, came up in Clash of the Titans…
“Dare you risk your sanity by drinking from the poisoned chalice that is John Parker’s Dementia?”….Is that a trick question? 🤔🤔🤔 If it is…my answer would still be…yes, yes I would! And if it isn’t….my answer would also be, yes, yes I would! 😂
Is the correct answer! You have won a trip to a desolate nightclub where you a mistaken for a sex-worker by a large man with a moustache!
Can I still change my answer? 🤔🤔
No, I’ll be round with your prize this evening, too late!
I’m moving to a hotel……🤔🤔🤔
Or a launderette…
“Inhuman, indecent, and the quintessence of gruesomeness” only makes me want to watch this more. I’m curious what could potentially make even David Lynch flinch!
And that quote undersells it; for a film you and I didn’t know existed, it’s all of these things and more!
Nope.
Ingonrous?? I can’t even guess WTH you meant there.
I’ve switched it for unlikely; incongrous was was I meant…was always going to be a Nope in your book, I suspect, incongrous or not…
yes, and I’m currently being ‘drugged into the mud’ of your next offering!
I’m not sure that drugged into the mud is wrong, but have adjusted. Not mastering wp’s new editor is causing some issues…
Sounds totally ingonrous! Thanks for the heads up!
It’s always interesting to see an old film so far ahead of what we’d expect from 1955. You wonder who these people were making it….it’s a great little film!
I’ve added it to my watchlist.